We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Acceptabilité des interventions en réduction des méfaits: contributions de la population aux débats ethiques de santé publique.
- Authors
Dubé E; Massé R; Noël L; Dubé, Eve; Massé, Raymond; Noël, Lina
- Abstract
<bold>Objective: </bold>To explore convergence and divergence in ethical stances of public health and of members of the population regarding acceptability of harm reduction interventions, in particular needle exchange programs.<bold>Methods: </bold>Forty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with French-speaking residents of Quebec City. Content analysis was done to explore the views of the respondents with regard to injection drug users (IDUs) and interventions addressed to them, as well as Quebec policies on harm reduction.<bold>Results: </bold>Four main categories of social representations about IDUs have emerged from the discourses of the respondents. IDU were represented as: suffering from a disease (n = 17); victim of a situation that they could not control (n = 14); having chosen to use drugs (n = 12); or delinquent people (n = 6). Those social representations were associated with different ethical stances regarding acceptability of harm reduction interventions. Main divergences between respondents' ethical positions on harm reduction and public health discourses were related to the value of tolerance and its limits.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The Quebec City population interviewed in this study had a high level of tolerance regarding needle distribution to drug addicts. Applied ethics could be a useful way to understand citizens' interpretation of public health interventions.
- Publication
Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2009, Vol 100, Issue 1, p24
- ISSN
0008-4263
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/bf03405487