We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
POSLJEDICE ERUPCIJE VULKANA HUAYNAPUTINA GODINE 1600. NA HRVATSKE ZEMLJE.
- Authors
Kužić, Krešimir
- Abstract
The eruption of the Huaynaputina volcano in southeast Peru on 18 February 1600 caused a massive amount of sulphur gases to inject into the stratosphere. As a result, an aerosol developed which shrouded the Northern hemisphere and subsequently caused climate anomalies which, in milder or more severe forms, affected the majority of Europe, including Croatian regions. The following 4 to 6 years saw extremely cold winters with heavy snowfall, periods of drought, extremely hot weather, as well as numerous severe hailstorms. Although the data found in chronicles from Croatian regions are scarce, the knowledge of circumstances can be completed by reading military logbooks and other correspondence. The data derived from ice core indicators and dendroclimatic indicators of three tree rings, according to which the average temperature dropped by 0.8 °C, provide plausible clues in reconstructing the effects on the wider area. The chronicler which recorded the most valuable information (until 1612) was don Vicenc Frljani6 of Boljun, Istria; the severe cold weather of 29 November 1600 is particularly worth mentioning in that context. A letter from Senj mentions a twenty-day violent bora appearing in September and October of 1601. It is known that somewhat later Osijek experienced heavy snowfall, and subsequently there were mentions of hailstorms and droughts as well as recurring harsh winters in other areas. The aforementioned phenomena are to be considered within the context of the so-called Little Ice Age which, according to some, lasted from 1450 to 1850 with certain fluctuations. The climate phenomena caused by the Huaynaputina vulcano eruption were just part of a longer period of adverse weather conditions. The consequent shortage of cereal stock led to the occurrence of famine in some parts, which was solved by procuring wheat from other regions. The coastal areas from Istria to Dubrovnik generally suffered from shortage of wheat, which is why it was imported by land from the nearer hinterland, that is, Herzegovina and Bosnia, or by sea from southern Italy and the Levant. Dubrovnik succeeded in achieving the highest level of care for the population, while other Dalmatian cities under Venetian rule often experienced problems with import due to military conflicts with the Ottomans. The plunders committed by the Ottoman army were the cause of the shortage which occurred in northern Croatia as well. Plague struck Split the hardest, taking the lives of almost 3,200 of the 4,223 inhabitants in 1607. The disease appeared in the Middle East and was transmitted via trading routes and by local military contingents hired by the Ottoman Empire to fight the Habsburgs in the area of Hungary. In eastern Bosnia and Sarajevo the disease spread as early as 1604, from where it entered Split due to trade, in spite of the existing lazaretto. Severe weather conditions certainly showed the greatest effect on a series of military operations in Hungary. The most fatal case was the long period of rainfall followed by the premature cold weather with heavy snow during the siege of the Ottoman fort of Kanisza from September to November of 1601. The severe cold led at least 3,000 soldiers to their death, while in further military operations the 'Turks' were inhibited in some of the actions as well. At the same time, the Adriatic was the setting of conflicts between the Venetian Republic and the Uskoks of Senj. The climate anomalies in those parts were characterized by periods of violent bora and stormy sirocco. Uskoks showed greater courage in such conditions, causing some Venetian officials to declare that the Uskoks were assisted by the Devil himself. The detail points to the widespread belief in Europe at the time, according to which witches had the power to provoke meteorological disasters. However, the Venetian provveditore Filippo Pasqualigo sincerely admitted in his report to the Venetian Senate that "... he was the general (...) in the summertime, while they (author's note: the Uskoks) ... were the generals during winter...".
- Publication
Economic & Ecohistory / Ekonomska i Ekohistorija, 2013, Vol 9, Issue 1, p97
- ISSN
1845-5867
- Publication type
Article