We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T for T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron.
- Authors
Alam, Mohammed H.; Auger, Dominique; McGill, Laura-Ann; Smith, Gillian C.; Taigang He; Izgi, Cemil; Baksi, A. John; Wage, Rick; Drivas, Peter; Firmin, David N.; Pennell, Dudley J.
- Abstract
Background: T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron concentration has improved the outcome of transfusion dependant anaemia patients. Clinical evaluation is performed at 1.5 T but scanners operating at 3 T are increasing in numbers. There is a paucity of data on the relative merits of iron quantification at 3 T vs 1.5 T. Methods: A total of 104 transfusion dependent anaemia patients and 20 normal volunteers were prospectively recruited to undergo cardiac and liver T2* assessment at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Intra-observer, inter-observer and inter-study reproducibility analysis were performed on 20 randomly selected patients for cardiac and liver T2*. Results: Association between heart and liver T2* at 1.5 T and 3 T was non-linear with good fit (R² = 0.954, p < 0.001 for heart white-blood (WB) imaging; R² = 0.931, p < 0.001 for heart black-blood (BB) imaging; R² = 0.993, p < 0.001 for liver imaging). R2* approximately doubled between 1.5 T and 3 T with linear fits for both heart and liver (94, 94 and 105 % respectively). Coefficients of variation for intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, as well as inter-study reproducibility trended to be less good at 3 T (3.5 to 6.5 %) than at 1.5 T (1.4 to 5.7 %) for both heart and liver T2*. Artefact scores for the heart were significantly worse with the 3 T BB sequence (median 4, IQR 2-5) compared with the 1.5 T BB sequence (4 [3-5], p = 0.007). Conclusion: Heart and liver T2* and R2* at 3 T show close association with 1.5 T values, but there were more artefacts at 3 T and trends to lower reproducibility causing difficulty in quantifying low T2* values with high tissue iron. Therefore T2* imaging at 1.5 T remains the gold standard for clinical practice. However, in centres where only 3 T is available, equivalent values at 1.5 T may be approximated by halving the 3 T tissue R2* with subsequent conversion to T2*.
- Subjects
ANEMIA treatment; HEART anatomy; HEART physiology; LIVER physiology; LIVER; ANEMIA; BLOOD transfusion; CHELATION therapy; CHI-squared test; CONFIDENCE intervals; DIAGNOSTIC imaging; ORGAN donation; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; IRON; LONGITUDINAL method; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; MEDICAL technology; RESEARCH funding; SCANNING systems; DATA analysis; MEDICAL artifacts; ANATOMY
- Publication
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (BioMed Central), 2016, Vol 18, p1
- ISSN
1532-429X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1186/s12968-016-0259-9