We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Differences between Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Stress and Coping Strategies.
- Authors
Ickes, Melinda J.; Brown, Joanne; Reeves, Brandy; Zephyr, Pierre Martin D.
- Abstract
Background and Purpose: Stress among college students, and the related health and academic consequences, remains an important issue for college health professionals. Yet, less is known about the reported coping strategies among both undergraduate and graduate students. Purpose: This crosssectional study examined differences between undergraduate and graduate college students in stress levels and coping behaviors. Methods: An online health behavior survey was administered to a random sample of 1,139 college students enrolled in 2011. Chi-square test of independence examined demographic differences, stress levels and coping strategies. Classification and Regression Tree analysis further explored coping strategies which differentiated groups. Results: Participants were primarily white (87.2%), graduate students (58.5%), and female (59.8%). Almost 80% reported moderate, much or great deal of stress, with no significant differences between undergraduate and graduate students. Sleep (69.6%), exercise (66.1%), and food (56.8%) were the most common coping strategies, regardless of academic classification. Social support as a coping strategy was the most important variable explaining differences between undergraduate and graduate students. Conclusion: Undergraduate and graduate college students cope with stress in a similar manner. However, social support was more likely among graduate students and may be an important strategy for future college health programming.
- Subjects
PREVENTION of psychological stress; PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation; CHI-squared test; EXERCISE; FISHER exact test; FOOD; HEALTH behavior; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION analysis; STATISTICAL sampling; SEX distribution; SLEEP; SMOKING; STATISTICS; STRESS management; SUBSTANCE abuse; DATA analysis; SOCIAL support; UNDERGRADUATES; CROSS-sectional method; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics
- Publication
Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 2015, Vol 13, Issue 1, p13
- ISSN
1545-8717
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.32398/cjhp.v13i1.1810