We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis with a Small Mechanical Prosthetic Valve.
- Authors
Ogata, Toshiro; Kaneko, Tatsuo; Obayashi, Tamiyuki; Ishikawa, Susumu; Sato, Yasushi; Murai, Noriyuki; Kaki, Nobuaki; Shibasaki, Ikuko; Taniguchi, Koichi; Morishita, Yasuo
- Abstract
A bstract Background: Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only effective treatment for patients with aortic stenosis (AS), it is recognized that the use of small prosthetic valves due to a small aortic root often affects postoperative course after AVR. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of small prosthetic valves was a risk factor of AVR for AS. Methods: We compared various perioperative factors and operative outcomes between patients with a small mechanical prosthetic valve (small group) and patients with a large mechanical prosthetic valve (large group). Results: Early mortality was 0% in each group and the 5-year mortality was 25% in the small group and 10% in the large group. There were no significant differences in perioperative factors between the two groups. The small group patients were significantly older and smaller compared to the large group patients. The valve size was significantly correlated with age and BSA. Conclusions: The use of small mechanical prostheses was not a risk factor of AVR for AS when it was proportionate to the BSA even for elderly patients. AVR using a small mechanical prosthetic valve may be performed with good results in the short-and long-term.
- Publication
Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2002, Vol 17, Issue 1, p70
- ISSN
0886-0440
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1540-8191.2001.tb01222.x