We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Right of Appeal against a Decision on Disciplinary Liability of a Judge.
- Authors
Pashuk, Taras
- Abstract
This article deals with the questions of scope and the standard of judicial review of a disciplinary decision against a judge. It further addresses the issue of remedial powers, which should be granted to the reviewing authority in this type of cases. It is suggested that the scope of judicial review of a disciplinary decision against a judge should extend to questions of law, fact and discretion. What actually varies is the depth of review or, more precisely, the standards of review and the corresponding level of deference, which must be demonstrated to the primary decision-making authority. It is further suggested that there are several factors that have influence on the formation of the standards of review: the institutional, procedural and expertise factors. As to the remedial capacity, the reviewing court should be provided with the competence to apply adequate remedial measures. The reviewing court should be able to effectively eliminate the identified shortcomings in the proceedings before the first-instance authority. For the effective protection of the rights at issue, it may be important for the reviewing court not only to repeal the decision subject to review, but also take other remedial measures. The legitimacy and necessity for applying particular remedial action should be established by taking into account the same institutional, procedural and expertise factors.
- Subjects
HUMAN rights violations -- Law &; legislation; EUROPEAN Court of Human Rights; JUSTICE administration; EUROPEAN Convention on Human Rights; JUDICIAL accountability
- Publication
East European Yearbook on Human Rights, 2019, Vol 2, Issue 1, p58
- ISSN
2589-7764
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5553/EEYHR/258977642019002001003