We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SEARCH AND SEIZURE--THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT MISTAKENLY INTERPRETS AND ADOPTS THE FEDERAL ATTENUATION DOCTRINE DESPITE CLEAR STATE PRECEDENT. STATE v. ESERJOSE, 259 P.3D 172 (Wash. 2011).
- Authors
Ma, Jessica
- Abstract
The article discusses state constitutional law and the Washington Supreme Court's ruling in the 2011 case State v. Eserjose which deals with search and seizure laws and the court's reported adoption of the federal attenuation doctrine. Article I, Section 7 of the Washington Constitution is addressed, along with illegal arrests and the exclusionary rule of evidence. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is examined, along with the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.
- Subjects
SEARCHES &; seizures (Law) -- Lawsuits &; claims; EXCLUSIONARY rule (Evidence); WASHINGTON (State). Supreme Court; FRUIT of the poisonous tree doctrine (Evidence); ACTION &; defense cases; FALSE arrest; UNITED States. Constitution. 4th Amendment
- Publication
Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, Vol 43, Issue 4, p747
- ISSN
0277-318X
- Publication type
Article