We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
'Populism' and competing epistemic communities in English educational policy: A response to Craske and Watson.
- Authors
Menzies, Loic
- Abstract
This article constitutes a 'reply and alternative' to two papers that appeared in a 2021 Special Issue of British Educational Research Journal. Both articles drew on theories of populism as a political logic to explain recent trends in England's education policy. I begin by highlighting how the contributors mobilise 'populist' political logics within their own 'anti‐populist' discourse. I then argue that the theory of epistemic communities, borrowed from the field of public policy analysis, offers an alternative interpretation of the dynamics described in (and exemplified by) the two articles. This alternative interpretation foregrounds the values, beliefs and policy enterprises of two rival communities that seek to influence education policy through the supply of expertise. I argue that attending to how these communities function helps explain how a new group of policy entrepreneurs has come to constitute an increasingly influential 'counter‐epistemic community' and established a mutually beneficial trade in legitimacy with English policy makers. To date, the theory of epistemic communities has been under‐utilised in the study of education policy, but applying the theory to education policy in England provides new insights into how these communities function when the nature of expertise is contested. England's educational policy context also exemplifies the importance of 'fit' between policy makers and experts' beliefs, and the role of policy makers in assembling and curating communities of experts.
- Subjects
ENGLAND; ENGLISH language education; EDUCATION policy; BELIEF &; doubt; POPULISM
- Publication
British Educational Research Journal, 2024, Vol 50, Issue 3, p1576
- ISSN
0141-1926
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/berj.3950