We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
UNDER PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE POLICIES REQUIRING UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE, QUESTION WHETHER OR NOT THE ALLEGED TORTFEASOR WHO STRUCK THE INSURED OPERATED AN UNINSURED AUTOMOBILE, IS TO BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT BEFORE ARBITRATION OF DAMAGES CAN BE HAD.
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in Helfand v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. case. Under Pennsylvania insurance policies requiring uninsured motorist coverage, question whether or not the alleged tortfeasor who struck the insured operated in uninsured automobile is to be determined by the court before arbitration of damages can be had.
- Subjects
PENNSYLVANIA; LEGAL judgments; STATE Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); AUTOMOBILE insurance; ARBITRATION &; award
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p123
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article