We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Cumulative versus end-of-course assessment: effects on self-study time and test performance.
- Authors
Kerdijk, Wouter; Cohen‐Schotanus, Janke; Mulder, B Florentine; Muntinghe, Friso L H; Tio, René A
- Abstract
Context Students tend to postpone preparation for a test until the test is imminent, which raises various risks associated with 'cramming' behaviours, including that for suboptimal learning. Cumulative assessment utilises spaced testing to stimulate students to study more frequently and to prevent procrastination. This randomised controlled study investigated how cumulative assessment affects time spent on self-study and test performance compared with end-of-course assessment. Methods A total of 78 undergraduate medical students in a Year 2 pre-clinical course were randomly assigned to either of two conditions. Students in the cumulative assessment condition were assessed in weeks 4, 8 and 10. Students in the end-of-course assessment condition were assessed in week 10 only. Each week, students reported the number of hours they spent on self-study. Results Students in the cumulative assessment condition ( n = 25) spent significantly more time on self-study than students in the end-of-course assessment condition ( n = 37) in all weeks of the course except weeks 5, 9 and 10. Overall, the cumulative assessment group spent 69 hours more on self-study during the course than did the control group, although the control group spent 7 hours more in studying during the final week of the course than did the cumulative assessment group. Students in the cumulative assessment condition scored slightly higher on questions concerning the content of the last part of the course. Conclusions Cumulative assessment encourages students to distribute their learning activities over a course, which leaves them more opportunity to study the content of the last part of the course prior to the final examination. There was no evidence for a short-term effect of cumulative assessment on overall knowledge gain. We hypothesise that larger positive effects might be found if retention were to be measured in the long term.
- Subjects
PROFESSIONAL education; ANALYSIS of variance; MEDICAL students; STUDY &; teaching of medicine; STATISTICAL sampling; RATING of students; STUDY skills; T-test (Statistics); TEST-taking skills; TIME; EFFECT sizes (Statistics); RANDOMIZED controlled trials; DESCRIPTIVE statistics
- Publication
Medical Education, 2015, Vol 49, Issue 7, p709
- ISSN
0308-0110
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/medu.12756