We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Improving quality control for in‐clinic hematology analyzers: Common myths and opportunities.
- Authors
Michael, Helen T.; Nabity, Mary B.; Couto, C. Guillermo; Moritz, Andreas; Harvey, John W.; DeNicola, Dennis B.; Hammond, Jeremy M.
- Abstract
A robust quality management system for automated hematology analyzers is crucial for generating high-quality results and instilling confidence in analyzer function. Improving quality control for in-clinic hematology analyzers: Common myths and opportunities Similarity of QCM to patient samples is not predictive of whether the QCM is able to evaluate analyzer functions. gl Myth #3: QC results reliably indicate that patient results are acceptable and correct As noted above, FC-QCM differs from veterinary patient samples. Different types of analyzers (eg, impedance analyzers, flow cytometry analyzers, and fluorescence flow cytometry analyzers) function differently and have different required features for QCM.
- Subjects
QUALITY control; CLINICS; HEMATOLOGY; QUALITY control charts; PATIENTS' attitudes
- Publication
Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 2022, Vol 51, Issue 3, p302
- ISSN
0275-6382
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/vcp.13154