We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Does Adhesive Resin Application Contribute to Resin Bond Durability on Etched and Silanized Feldspathic Ceramic?
- Authors
Passos, Sheila Pestana; Luiz Felipe Valandro; Amaral, Regina; Özcan, Mutlu; Bottino, Marco Antonio; Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu
- Abstract
Purpose: To assess the effect of adhesive application and aging on the bond durability of resin cement to etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic. Materials and Methods: Twenty blocks (6.4 x 6.4 x 4.8 mm) of feldspathic ceramic (Vita VM7) were produced. The ceramic surfaces were conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid gel for 60 s and silanized. They were then randomly divided into two groups. While half of the group received no adhesive, in the other half, a layer of adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) was applied. Each ceramic block was then placed in its silicone mold with the treated surface exposed. The dual-cured resin cement (Variolink II) was injected into the mold over the treated surface and polymerized. Specimens were sectioned to achieve nontrimmed bar specimens (approximately 12 sticks/block) that were randomly divided into 2 groups: a) non-aged - microtensile bond test immediately after sectioning; b) aged-thermocycling (TC) 12,000 times, 5°C to 55°C, and water storage (50 days). The microtensile bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The failure types were examined using an optical light microscope and SEM. Bond strength results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results: The adhesive application affected the bond strength results significantly (p = 0.0001) (without adhesive > with adhesive). While aging conditions did not reduce the bond strength in the groups that received no adhesive (20 ± 5.3 MPa non-aged and 21.5 ± 5.6 aged) (p = 0.1698), it significantly affected the bond strength results of the group with adhesive application (18 ± 4.4 MPa to 14.4 ± 4.7 MPa) (p < 0.001). All groups showed mainly mixed type of failures between the ceramic and the resin cement (81% to 100%). The group in which no adhesive was applied presented a higher incidence of cohesive failure of ceramic after aging (18%) than those of the other groups. Conclusion: The use of adhesive did not improve resin cement adhesion to the etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic after long-term thermocycling and water storage.
- Subjects
DENTISTRY; DENTAL care; TOOTH care &; hygiene; DENTAL bonding; DENTIN; DENTAL materials; DENTAL adhesives; GUMS &; resins; DENTAL resins; DENTAL cements
- Publication
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2008, Vol 10, Issue 6, p455
- ISSN
1461-5185
- Publication type
Article