We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
SÖZLEŞMENİN SÖZ'Ü: UZLAŞIMSAL VE GERÇEK YANI ÜZERİNE LOCKE VE HEGEL.
- Authors
ATEŞOĞLU, Güçlü
- Abstract
While the nature of the contract presupposes the movement of abstract individuals towards abstract unity, a two-sided abstraction accompanies thought. Both are representative, one-sided. In G.W.F. Hegel's philosophy, what is meant by the substantive element of right is real contracts, unlike conventional contracts based on moral nature, in other words, consensus. His emphasis on the normative as opposed to the moral to John Locke and other empiricists indicates a paradigm shift. Rather than an arbitrary and perishable contract, it is a preparatory reflection on what constitutes the modern state. The delusion or mistake of Locke and all kinds of empiricism is to reduce subjectivity to the facts of consciousness and to a representative world of mind, and to the structure that assumes objectivity as given and unchanging. The conventional structure of contract thought also brings with it a historical-ontological overcoming in the sense that they remain oppositional in the individual-society relationship. Hegel's standpoint, as can be seen from his other works, is an ontology in that it is the metaphysics of reason versus the metaphysics of the understanding, and it differs from the dominant epistemological view of the previous era. In accordance with our subject, it is political ontology or, to put it later, the ontology of social existence.
- Publication
Academic Journal of Philosophy / Felsefi Düşün, 2022, Issue 19, p41
- ISSN
2148-0958
- Publication type
Article