We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
SALES -- NEW YORK -- ARBITRABILITY -- CHARGE TO THE JURY.
- Abstract
The article focuses on the decision given by a U.S. court in the lawsuit S. Kornblum Metals Co. v. Intsel Corp., in the year 1976. The court held that where the buyer had sent a purchase order containing an arbitration clause and the seller, with the purchase order before him, confirmed the oral agreement for sale of zinc and requested a modification as to terms of payment, which the buyer accepted and sent another purchase order, the court held that this was sufficient evidence to support a jury's finding that it was the intention of the parties because of their conduct and their past dealings and custom to have any controversy arising out of their agreement submitted to arbitration.
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ARBITRATION &; award; S. Kornblum Metals Co.; INTSEL Corp.; PURCHASE orders; SALES; NEGOTIATION
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1976, Vol 31, Issue 3, p217
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article