We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Integrating case-finding and initial management for osteoarthritis, anxiety, and depression into primary care long-term condition reviews: results from the ENHANCE pilot trial.
- Authors
Healey, Emma L; Mallen, Christian D; Chew-Graham, Carolyn A; Nicholls, Elaine; Lewis, Martyn; Lawton, Sarah A; Finney, Andrew G; Tan, Valerie; Cooper, Vince; Dziedzic, Krysia S; Liddle, Jennifer; Wathall, Simon; Jinks, Clare
- Abstract
<bold>Background: </bold>Multimorbidity is increasingly the norm; however, primary care remains focused on single diseases. Osteoarthritis, anxiety, and depression are frequently comorbid with other long-term conditions (LTCs), but rarely prioritized by clinicians.<bold>Objectives: </bold>To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention integrating case-finding and management for osteoarthritis, anxiety, and depression within LTC reviews.<bold>Methods: </bold>A pilot stepped-wedge RCT across 4 general practices recruited patients aged ≥45 years attending routine LTC reviews. General practice nurses provided usual LTC reviews (control period), then, following training, delivered the ENHANCE LTC review (intervention period). Questionnaires, an ENHANCE EMIS-embedded template and consultation audio-recordings, were used in the evaluation.<bold>Results: </bold>General practice recruitment and training attendance reached prespecified success criteria. Three hundred and eighteen of 466 (68%) of patients invited responded; however, more patients were recruited during the control period (206 control, 112 intervention). Eighty-two percent and 78% returned their 6-week and 6-month questionnaires, respectively. Integration of the ENHANCE LTC review into routine LTC reviews varied. Case-finding questions were generally used as intended for joint pain, but to a lesser extent for anxiety and depression. Initial management through referrals and signposting were lacking, and advice was more frequently provided for joint pain. The stepped-wedge design meant timing of the training was challenging and yielded differential recruitment.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>This pilot trial suggests that it is feasible to deliver a fully powered trial in primary care. Areas to optimize include improving the training and reconsidering the stepped-wedge design and the approach to recruitment by targeting those with greatest need.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN: 12154418). Date registered: 6 August 15. Date first participant was enrolled: 13 July 2015. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12154418?q=depression%20schizophrenia&filters=conditionCategory:Not%20Applicable&sort=&offset=5&totalResults=9&page=1&pageSize=20&searchType=basic-search.
- Subjects
ANXIETY treatment; OSTEOARTHRITIS treatment; PILOT projects; RESEARCH; RESEARCH methodology; JOINT pain; EVALUATION research; PRIMARY health care; COMPARATIVE studies; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; MENTAL depression; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH funding
- Publication
Family Practice, 2022, Vol 39, Issue 4, p592
- ISSN
0263-2136
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1093/fampra/cmab113