We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Omor deosebit de grav. Viol. Nelegala sesizare a instanţei. Restituirea cauzei la parchet. Neîndeplinirea cerinţelor prevăzute de art. 332 C. pr. pen. Aprecierea probelor conform art. 63 C. pr. pen. Retractarea declaraţiilor inculpatului din cursul urmăririi penale. Interpretarea acestora conform art. 69 C. pr. pen., coroborate cu concluziile probelor ştiinţifice administrate în cauză. Detenţie pe viaţă. Criterii avute în vedere de instanţă
- Authors
Purice, Delia; Siserman, Sorina
- Abstract
Only the non-observance of the provisions related to the notification of the court constitutes a ground of the restitution of the case to the prosecutor, and the appreciation of the illegal nature of the evidence obtained by the prosecutor during the criminal investigation represents the responsibility of the court which rules only after having performed the forensic investigation and following the debates, by a decision. According to art. 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, no difference is made between the probative value of the evidence produced during the stage of the criminal investigation and the evidence produced during the trial stage and there is no lega! ground to create an order of preference regarding the defendant's statements given in different stages of the trial.
- Publication
Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2013, Issue 3, p114
- ISSN
1844-6450
- Publication type
Article