We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
- Authors
Perivoliotis, Konstantinos; Baloyiannis, Ioannis; Sarakatsianou, Chamaidi; Tzovaras, George
- Abstract
Purpose: A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis were designed and conducted, in order to provide an up-to-date comparison of the robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (LA) adrenalectomy in terms of perioperative efficacy and safety. Methods: The present meta-analysis was completed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the PRISMA study group and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) were screened. For the reduction of type I errors, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. Results: Overall, 21 studies and 2997 patients were included in this study. RA was associated with a significantly lower open conversion rate (OR: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.10, 2.92) and length of hospitalization (LOS WMD: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.2, 0.84). Marginal results regarding blood loss were recorded (WMD: 2.02; 95%CI: 0.0, 4.03). TSA could not validate the superiority of RA in open conversion rate and blood loss. LA and RA were similar in terms of operative duration (P = 0.18) and positive margin (P = 0.81), complications (P = 0.94) and mortality rate (P = 0.45). Conclusions: Even though RA and LA were equivalent regarding perioperative safety, RA was associated with a favorable LOS.
- Subjects
SEQUENTIAL analysis; FALSE positive error; ADRENALECTOMY; ROBOTICS
- Publication
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2020, Vol 405, Issue 2, p125
- ISSN
1435-2443
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00423-020-01860-9