We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
I. REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.
- Authors
Griffiths, L. C.; Werner, Ray O.
- Abstract
The article reports on legal developments relating to the regulation of monopolistic methods in the field of marketing in the U.S. The author discusses the court case of Anaconda Company v. Crane Company in relation to market control. The court case the United States v. Amax Incorporated and Copper Range Company is mentioned in relation to a prospective merger of the two corporations. The author also includes information about the court case the United States v. United States Gypsum Company. The court cases the United States v. Bechtel and CASS Student Advertising v. National Education Advertising Service are discussed in relation to market exclusion tactics.
- Subjects
UNITED States; MARKETING laws; COMMERCIAL law; ADVERTISING laws; MONOPOLISTIC competition; MONOPOLY laws; UNFAIR competition; MERGERS &; acquisitions law; ANACONDA Copper Mining Co.; COPPER Range Inc.; USG Corp.; TRIALS (Law); ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); GOVERNMENT policy
- Publication
Journal of Marketing, 1976, Vol 40, Issue 3, p92
- ISSN
0022-2429
- Publication type
Article