We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Judicial Reform or Abusive Constitutionalism in Israel.
- Authors
Roznai, Yaniv; Dixon, Rosalind; Landau, David E
- Abstract
How should the constitutional reform in Israel be assessed in comparative terms? Comparative constitutional understandings point to the centrality of three key sets of norms as part of the 'democratic minimum core': (i) commitments to free and fair, regular multi-party elections; (ii) political rights and freedoms; and (iii) a system of institutional checks and balances necessary to maintain (i) and (ii). Any change in judicial power and independence must be assessed against the benchmark of the democratic minimum core, and by reference to its cumulative practical effect on a system of institutional checks and balances. We claim that recent changes in Israel may already threaten these institutional checks, and have the potential to do more damage in the future, if given broad effect and if combined with further changes in the power and independence of the Supreme Court. On this basis, we suggest, the relevant changes should be viewed as either 'abusive' or 'proto-abusive' in nature. By threatening to undermine both the power and independence of the Supreme Court of Israel, they directly threaten the health of the constitutional checks and balances system and, hence, the 'democratic minimum core' in Israel.
- Subjects
ISRAEL; JUDICIAL reform; JUDICIAL power; CONSTITUTIONAL reform; CONSTITUTIONALISM; POLITICAL rights; CONSTITUTIONAL law
- Publication
Israel Law Review (Cambridge University Press), 2023, Vol 56, Issue 3, p292
- ISSN
0021-2237
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1017/S0021223723000171