We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Vows, Oaths, and the Propagation of a Subversive Discourse.
- Authors
Gray, Jonathan Michael
- Abstract
In sixteenth-century England, two discourses of divine promises existed side by side. First, Protestants and Catholics both upheld oaths as binding promises, undergirded by the sanctity of God and his holy name. Second, Protestants attacked monastic vows, claiming that these divine promises could and should be broken. Protestants did not want their challenge of monastic vows to subvert the sanctity of oaths. As such, during their campaign against monastic vows, Protestants attempted to safeguard the binding nature of oaths by emphasizing the qualitative difference between vows and oaths or (in the case of English Protestants) emphasizing the distinction between monastic vows and other lawful promises, and then striving to demonstrate that monastic vows were unlawful based on their content, conditions, or circumstances. The same arguments Protestants used to attack monastic vows were, however, adapted and applied in a subversive manner to the state oaths of the English Reformation.
- Subjects
ENGLAND; VOWS; PROMISES in Christianity; OATHS; MONASTICISM &; religious orders; ENGLISH Catholics; PROTESTANTS; ENGLISH Reformation; ENGLISH church history; SIXTEENTH century
- Publication
Sixteenth Century Journal, 2010, Vol 41, Issue 3, p731
- ISSN
0361-0160
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1086/scj40997348