We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Degrees of negative judgement: Insights from a qualitative study of six sentencing remarks on judges' sentencing practices.
- Authors
Dai, Xin
- Abstract
Studies on sentencing are dominated by normative studies prescribing how judges should sentence. Few studies examine how judges actually sentence. This study provides an insight into the empirical reality of judges' sentencing practices by examining their negative judgements (of propriety) of offenders and their behaviour in six sentencing remarks. It finds that judges are doing more appraisal work when their sentencing decisions are below or much higher than the starting point, but less appraisal work when their sentencing decisions are just a few years above the starting point. Such findings demonstrate that the starting point has a binding power on judges' sentencing practices despite judges having the discretion to arrive at a sentencing decision of any length (whatever the starting point). Findings of the current study could provide meaningful starting points for future examination of large quantities of sentencing remarks.
- Subjects
JUDGES; SENTENCING guidelines (Criminal procedure); QUALITATIVE research; CRIMINALS; LEGAL professions
- Publication
Pragmatics & Society, 2024, Vol 15, Issue 4, p584
- ISSN
1878-9714
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1075/ps.21068.dai