We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
THE OLD BAIT AND SWITCH: THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECLINED TO VACATE A REMAND ORDER AS A SANCTION UNDER RULE 60(B)(3) IN BARLOW V. COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO.
- Authors
Murphy, Spencer R.
- Abstract
The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's decision to decline to vacate a remand order as a sanction under Rule 60(B)(3) of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the 2014 case Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Co. A lack of diversity jurisdiction is mentioned, along with legal exceptions and subject matter jurisdiction in America. Plaintiffs Joyce Barlow and Clare Mosko are assessed, as well as claims that some makeup products contain asbestos and cause cancer.
- Subjects
UNITED States; REMAND (Venue); COLGATE-Palmolive Co.; UNITED States. Court of Appeals (4th Circuit); DIVERSITY jurisdiction lawsuits; LEGAL sanctions; CHEMISTRY of cosmetics; EXCEPTIONS (Law); APPELLATE procedure; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Creighton Law Review, 2014, Vol 48, Issue 1, p145
- ISSN
0011-1155
- Publication type
Article