We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Imaging Radiation Doses and Associated Risks and Benefits in Subjects Participating in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.
- Authors
Fresco, Rodrigo; Spera, Gonzalo; Meyer, Carlos; Cabral, Pablo; Mackey, John R.
- Abstract
Background. Medical imaging is commonly required in breast cancer (BC) clinical trials to assess the efficacy and/or safety of study interventions. Despite the lack of definitive epidemiological data linking imaging radiation with cancer development in adults, concerns exist about the risks of imaging radiation-induced malignancies (IRIMs) in subjects exposed to repetitive imaging. We estimated the imaging radiation dose and IRIM risk in subjects participating in BC trials. Materials and Methods.The imaging protocol requirements in 10 phase III trials in the adjuvant and advanced settings were assessed to estimate the effective radiation dose received by a typical and fully compliant subject in each trial. For each study, the excess lifetime attributable cancer risk (LAR) was calculated using the National Cancer Institute's Radiation Risk Assessment Tool, version 3.7.1. Dose and risk calculations were performed for both imaging intensive and non intensive approaches to reflect the variability in imaging performed within the studies. Results. The total effective imaging radiation dose was 0.4-262.2 mSv in adjuvant trials and 26-241.3 mSv in metastatic studies. The dose variability resulted from differing protocol requirements and imaging intensity approaches, with computed tomography, multi-gated acquisition scans, and bone scans as the major contributors. The mean LAR was 1.87-2,410/100,000 in adjuvant trials (IRIM: 0.0002%-2.41% of randomized subjects) and 6.9-67.3/100,000 in metastatic studies (IRIM: 0.007%-0.067% of subjects). Conclusion. IRIMs are infrequent events. In adjuvant trials, aligning the protocol requirements with the clinical guidelines' surveillance recommendations and substituting radiating procedures with equivalent nonradiating ones would reduce IRIM risk. No significant risk has been observed in metastatic trials, and potential concerns on IRIMs are not justified.
- Subjects
BREAST tumor diagnosis; TUMOR prevention; CANCER treatment; METASTASIS; TUMOR risk factors; CLINICAL trials; DIAGNOSTIC imaging; PUBLIC health surveillance; RADIATION doses; TUMORS; DESCRIPTIVE statistics
- Publication
Oncologist, 2015, Vol 20, Issue 7, p702
- ISSN
1083-7159
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0295