We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Antibakteriyel İçerikli Adeziv Sistemler ile Antibakteriyel Olmayan Adezivlerin Mikrosızıntı Açısından Karşılaştırılarak Değerlendirilmesi: Deneysel Çalışma.
- Authors
BAKIR, Şeyhmus; AKBIYIK, Sema YAZICI; ÜNAL, Samican; BAKIR, Elif Pınar
- Abstract
Objective: To compare and evaluate the effects of adhesive systems containing antibacterial agent and adhesive systems (Gluma 2 Bond, Clearfil SE Protect) without antibacterial adhesive agent (Gluma Self Etch Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, 3M ESPE Single Universal) on microleakage in Class V composite restorations. Material and Methods: 35 permanent third molars without caries and restoration were used. Class V cavities of 4x3x3 mm were prepared on the buccal surfaces of each tooth. The teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups with 7 teeth in each group. Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE, USA) for the 1st group teeth, Gluma 2 Bond (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) for the 2nd group, Gluma Self Etch Bond (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) for the 3rd group, Clearfil SE Protect (Kuraray, Japan) for the 4th group, Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) adhesive systems were applied to the 5th group teeth. Nano hybrid filled composite resin was applied to all samples in the groups and finishing-polishing processes were performed. Then, 1,000 times thermal cycle (NOVA, Türkiye) process was applied. After the restorations were covered with nail polish, they were kept in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution. The teeth were cut vertically in the buccolingual direction and examined with a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. The results were statistically evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The significance level of 0.05 was used when interpreting the results. Results: When the microleakage scores between the groups were compared, it was seen that there was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) but Gluma 2 Bond with antibacterial content showed the highest microleakage value. Conclusion: There was no significant relationship in terms of microleakage between adhesive systems with antibacterial content and adhesive systems without antibacterial agents. Among the antibacterial adhesive systems, Clearfil SE Protect showed lower microleakage than Gluma 2 Bond.
- Subjects
TURKEY; MANN Whitney U Test; THIRD molars; NAIL polish; ANTIBACTERIAL agents; THERMOCYCLING
- Publication
Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Dental Sciences, 2022, Vol 28, Issue 3, p667
- ISSN
1300-7734
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5336/dentalsci.2021-86750