We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The work of tort law: Why nonconsensual access to the workplace matters?
- Authors
Dorfman, Avihay
- Abstract
Tort law does many things—it determines substantive rights, decides what counts as violating these rights, recognizes rights of repair, and grants rights of redress. Two non-instrumentalist conceptions of tort law appear to dominate how we are supposed to understand and discharge these tasks. One conception takes tort law to be the law of wrongs, whereas the other conception identifies tort law with the law of victim recourse. I argue that both conceptions (including a combination of both) mischaracterize what tort law does and what it should be doing. By contrast, the conception I shall defend—viz., the conflict theory of tort law—takes the basic task of tort law to be identifying the value of the conflict to which it responds (or which it shapes). In fact, there are three types of conflicts: inherently valuable, tolerably valuable, and valueless. Each type of conflict calls for a qualitatively different response by the law of torts. The conflict theory, I argue, changes the way we understand and determine the rights, duties, liabilities, and remedies that arise in and around tort law. I demonstrate this claim in connection with the tort of battery and then extend the analysis to capture the tort law of workplace and, in particular, trespass law as it applies to nonconsensual access to the workplace by organizers and by workers.
- Subjects
WORK environment; TORT theory; CONFLICT theory; SOCIAL theory; SOCIAL conflict
- Publication
Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 2023, Vol 24, Issue 1, p74
- ISSN
1565-1509
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1515/til-2023-0006