The article offers information on the Gödel/ Schmidt example of Kripkean Dogma, where there is dispute between descriptivism and the casual historical theory. It states that if Ron Mallon, Edouard Machery, Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich (MMNS) are right about Gödel/ Schmidt case, it doesn't gives a deductive argument against the other anti-descriptivist moves, however, it might give inductive argument against them.