We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Efectele perimării cu privire la cheltuielile de judecată efectuate de pârâții-reclamanți pentru soluționarea cererii reconvenționale, formulată în subsidiar, în ipoteza admiterii cererii principale.
- Abstract
The stay of proceedings of the proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations on the part of the defendant does not justify a finding of procedural fault on the part of the defendant-plaintiff, with the consequence that the application for costs of the counterclaim, which is subsidiary in nature and conditional on the grant of the main claim, is dismissed. The obsolescence or annulment of the principal claim does not render ineffective the incidental claims, justifying the reimbursement of the stamp duty in the procedure established by Article 45 of Government Emergency Ordinance No 80/2013.
- Subjects
STAMP duties; OBSOLESCENCE; REIMBURSEMENT; COST; DEFENDANTS
- Publication
Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă, 2022, Issue 3, p172
- ISSN
1844-6450
- Publication type
Article