We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Application of Circular Footprint Formula in Bioenergy/Bioeconomy: Challenges, Case Study, and Comparison with Life Cycle Assessment Allocation Methods.
- Authors
Farrapo Jr., Antonio Carlos; Matheus, Thiago Teixeira; Lagunes, Ricardo Musule; Filleti, Remo; Yamaji, Fabio; Lopes Silva, Diogo Aparecido
- Abstract
Allocation methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a relevant issue for the Circular Bioeconomy context. The recent Product Environmental Footprint Guide from the European Commission includes the Circular Footprint Formula (CFF) as a new way to deal with energy recovery/recycling processes. This paper investigated CFF vs. other different LCA allocation methods in Brazilian briquette production. A cradle-to-gate LCA study was conducted considering 1 MJ of energy from recovered and dedicated Eucalyptus briquette production. Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) were selected as the impact categories to evaluate the allocation methods choice that influences the potential impacts. LCA results were compared regarding four allocation methods. Eucalyptus wood as a biomass supply scenario achieved impact results up to 4.3 kg CO2-eq. for GWP and 0.0272 MJ-eq. for CED. The recovery wood scenario presented LCA burdens reduction by up to 206% for GWP, however a 492% increase in the CED results. CFF provided the lowest results for both impact categories. However, the CFF method still doesn't address particular aspects of circular bioenergy systems. Biomass and bioenergy LCA require further adjustments focusing on biochemical flows in the CFF calculation procedure to lead the development of innovative circular business models.
- Subjects
PRODUCT life cycle assessment; EUROPEAN Commission; ENERGY consumption; WOOD; BRIQUETS; WASTE recycling; EUCALYPTUS
- Publication
Sustainability (2071-1050), 2023, Vol 15, Issue 3, p2339
- ISSN
2071-1050
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.3390/su15032339