We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
European Union Litigation.
- Authors
Esposito LLM, Fabrizio; Almeida LLM, Lucila de
- Abstract
B I Abstract i b I : This article provides an overview of cases decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning contract law. Condominio Meda challenged the order for payment before the referring court, arguing that it was a consumer within the meaning of the UCTD and that Article 6(3) of that contract was an unfair contract term. The Court recalls that it 'previously held that a person other than a natural person who concludes a contract with a seller or supplier cannot be regarded as a consumer within the meaning of Article 2(b)' of the Directive (judgment of 22 November 2001, I Cape and Idealservice MN RE i , C-541/99 and C-542/99, EU:C:2001:625, para 16). Consumer Credit Making the obligation to evaluate the consumer's creditworthiness effective: Judgment in Case... This judgment applies to the Consumer Credit Directive, the conceptual apparatus that the Court of Justice has been developing in its interpretation of general consumer law and, in particular, the Unfair Contract Terms Directive.
- Subjects
CONTRACTS; VALUE-added tax; CREDIT card fees; OPTICAL communications
- Publication
European Review of Contract Law, 2020, Vol 16, Issue 3, p438
- ISSN
1614-9920
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1515/ercl-2020-0024