We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
UNITED STATES v. SAFEHOUSE: AN UNINTENDED AND UNNECESSARY HOBBLING OF LOCAL DISCRETION IN RESPONDING TO THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC.
- Authors
Wilkinson IV, Marshall P.
- Abstract
The article discusses the court case, United States v. Safehouse, and the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which declared the illegality of facilities, such as the facility of non-profit organization Safehouse, under the U.S. Code 856(a)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act. Topics discussed include the expansion of federal criminal liability as a result of the decision, the facts of the case, and the interpretation of the provision by other courts of appeals.
- Subjects
UNITED States; CONTROLLED substances; UNITED States. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit); CONTROLLED Substances Act, 1970 (U.S.); CRIMINAL liability
- Publication
Temple Law Review, 2022, Vol 95, Issue 1, p139
- ISSN
0899-8086
- Publication type
Article