We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Escaping the Takings Maze: Impact Fees and the Limits of the Takings Clause.
- Authors
Switzer, Charles Thompson
- Abstract
The article presents an analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court takings jurisprudence in the case of Lingle v. Chevron USA Inc. It explores the case history of impact fees as a subset of regulatory takings, and examines the relationship between impact fees and the Takings Clause. It notes that the court clarified takings jurisprudence by endorsing four takings categories including physical invasions, regulatory takings, physical exactions, and deprivations of all economically beneficial use.
- Subjects
UNITED States; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); EMINENT domain; IMPACT fees; HISTORICAL jurisprudence; LEGAL certainty; LINGLE v. Chevron USA Inc. (Supreme Court case); UNITED States. Supreme Court; LAW
- Publication
Vanderbilt Law Review, 2009, Vol 62, Issue 4, p1315
- ISSN
0042-2533
- Publication type
Article