We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Dynastic Scenario Thinking in the Holy Roman Empire*.
- Authors
van der Steen, Jasper
- Abstract
Owing to the prevailing definition of 'dynasty' as a line of succession, historians have long neglected the fundamental tensions that underlie succession, and have undervalued both the active attempts of princes to control these tensions as well as their ability to anticipate the need to adjust to changing circumstances. Yet premodern dynasties were well equipped to anticipate and develop coping mechanisms for a wide range of future challenges regarding succession, religion, marital alliances and extinction. They did so by considering alternative scenarios for the future in house regulations. Using as an example the seventeenth-century house of Nassau in the Holy Roman Empire, this article argues that even though conflict remained endemic to dynastic power, future-orientated regulations constituted a basic consensus within princely families on how to deal with conflict, which both reflected and contributed to the associative political practices that held the Holy Roman Empire together.
- Subjects
NASSAU (Duchy); ROYAL houses; ROYAL succession; KINGS &; rulers; PRINCES; POWER (Social sciences); HOLY Roman Empire
- Publication
Past & Present, 2022, Vol 256, Issue 1, p87
- ISSN
0031-2746
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/pastj/gtab029