We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
To Be or Not to Be, That Is the Question: Yhwh and Ea.
- Authors
KITZ, ANNE MARIE
- Abstract
Over one hundred years have past since Paul Haupt first proposed that the divine name Yhwh is an imperfect hiphil verbal form from the root *√hwy ("to be") that means "he causes to be > he creates." In this article, I propose that the Semitic concept of a *√hwy deity, a deity's whose name is formed from this root, began in the East when Enki, the Sumerian god of subterranean waters, acquired the Semitic name Ea. To this day Ea, written E2-a, is conjectured to derive from the Proto-Semitic root *√hyy ("to live"), a hypothesis founded on an old reading of the cuneiform sign E2 and its associative vocalic values that were, at the time, based on later Akkadian dialects. It is now known, however, that, prior to the Ur III period, E2 was read ...a3 and reflects /ha/. With this refinement in hand it is now possible to show that Ea's name was pronounced either /haya/ and/or /haway/, a third person masculine singular stative or predicative construction of √hyy/hwy. It means "he is/exists." It is feasible, therefore, that the earliest articulation of the West's *√hwy deity was /yahway/, an imperfect yaqtal G-stem. Although this means that /yahwĕ(h)/ qua hiphil is a later development, the subsequent shift to a causative marks a fundamental theological change in the evolution of the Semitic perception of a *√hwy deity's true nature.
- Subjects
NAME of God in Christianity; SEMITIC gods; DIALECTS; CHRISTIANITY; MIDDLE Eastern gods
- Publication
Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 2018, Vol 80, Issue 2, p191
- ISSN
0008-7912
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1353/cbq.2018.0047