We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Canine retraction and anchorage loss using self‑ligating and conventional brackets with sliding mechanics: A split‑mouth clinical study.
- Authors
Tiwari, Anurag; Aafaque, Syed; Y., Rizwana; Quadri, Syed Altafuddin; B., Kanagasabapathy; Villuri, Chandrika; J., Suresh Babu; C., Swarnalatha; Nayyar, Abhishek Singh
- Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Appliance biocompatibility, orthodontic treatment efficiency and patient convenience are the major issues confronting contemporary orthodontic practice. Very few studies have been published till date regarding the efficiency of self‑ligating brackets as against conventional brackets. Hence, the present study was planned to compare the rate of canine retraction between self‑ligating and conventional brackets and to determine the amount of anchorage loss during canine retraction. METHODS: The present clinical study was designed as a prospective, observational study comprising of 25 patients requiring first premolar extraction as a part of orthodontic treatment. Self‑ligating and conventional brackets were bonded using a split‑mouth study design randomly. Retraction of canines was done with 150 grams of force using Dontrix gauge with E‑chains. The study was conducted in relation to upper arch only, while the rate of retraction was evaluated every 4 weeks for 3 months. Average rates of retraction in 3 months were calculated. For anchorage loss, an acrylic guide plug was used in mid‑treatment cast (T0) and after 3 months of retraction (T3). The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Independent t‑test was used to compare the means of the two variables studied, while Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the variables studied in the groups included. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the average rate of canine retraction with self‑ligating brackets vs. conventional brackets over a period of 3 months came out to be 0.6434, while on comparing the data in terms of anchorage loss over a period of 3 months, the respective correlation coefficient value was found to be 0.6659 with the results being statistically highly significant in either case (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Self‑ligating brackets showed double the amount of displacement compared to conventional brackets in some of the cases. Also, chair side time was significantly reduced with self‑ligating brackets as against conventional brackets.
- Subjects
CUSPIDS; ORTHODONTIC appliances; SPSS (Computer software); STATISTICAL correlation; DATA analysis
- Publication
Journal of Orthodontic Science, 2023, Vol 12, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
2278-1897
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.4103/jos.jos_29_23