We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
名实与真实:探索“真实性”议题的本土话语分析框架.
- Authors
李菲
- Abstract
Considering the increasing hot discussions on"Authenticity"in China in the past two decades, it should be pointed out, however, that the inquiry of"Authenticity"reflected essentially the dominant ideology and discourse of how the western world think of "what-is-authentic" in the first place. Nowadays in tourism studies, the concept of"Authenticity"was widely used for analyzing different kinds of tourist cultural phenomenon from Western to nonWestern world, while it had not yet been fully reflected in different cultural context. Accordingly, during the transformation from the pre-modern"You"( 游) to the modern"Tourism"in China, the synchronically-transplanted concept of"Authenticity"from Western world should be resettled diachronically into the native ideology and practice tradition of China for a deeper understanding. Based on detailed tracing and analysis of the historical, cultural and philosophical significance of the Chinese native idea of"Ming-Shi"(名实观) and the concrete case studies of Xu Xiake(徐霞客) and Li Shizhen(李时珍), the two great travelers in ancient China, the inquiry of relationship between"Ming"(名) and"Shi"(实) could be compared with the conception of"Authenticity"in Western culture because of their inner concern to explore what are the true meanings, real natures and historic characters of things. However, the idea of"MingShi"(名实观) also has some pretty different implications in Chinese tradition which could provide for further discussion on"what is authentic"out of the western discourse context: Firstly, the Chinese idea of"Ming-Shi"( 名实观) mainly concerns the relationship between Names and Things —behind which, the relationship between man and the world indeed. It’s different from the ultimate inquiry on"Absolute Idea"in the Western philosophical tradition. Secondly, the"Rectification of Names"( 正 名) should be understood rather as the ethical concern on social orders and essential relevance between man and his world than the logical judgment on what is authentic or inauthentic, true or false, right or wrong. Thirdly, since "Ming"( 名) and "Shi"( 实) are both social-historically constructed, they are flexible and negotiable during the process of social changes, and could only be practiced and embodied by man himself. That is to say, the idea of"Ming-Shi"(名实观) is fundamentally about the issue of embodiment—embodied Authenticity/Actuality/Reality, which could be experienced and understood in flesh and meat, rather than be speculated in abstract ways. In summary, by introducing the native idea of"Ming-Shi"( 名 实 观), this paper(1) reveals the inner cultural/ethnic dimension of bodily certification of"Ming-Shi"(正名) of Chinese traditional"You"(游);(2) reflects the theoretic limit of the universal discourse of"Authenticity"in contemporary tourism studies while setting up an experimental analysis framework on"Authenticity"with this Chinese theoretic reference of"Ming-Shi"( 名-实); and finally,(3) tries to promote the general discussion of"Authenticity"to a dynamic understanding of"Authentication"and examine its comprehensive motivations in the view of social/history construction of"Ming-Shi"(名-实) in China.
- Subjects
CHINA; WESTERN countries; SOCIAL order; SOCIAL change; TRACE analysis; RIGHT &; wrong; LI Shizhen; XU Xiake
- Publication
Tourism Tribune / Lvyou Xuekan, 2020, Vol 35, Issue 3, p50
- ISSN
1002-5006
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.l9765/j.cnki.L002-5006.2020.03.0l0