We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
TCCON and NDACC XCO measurements: difference, discussion and application.
- Authors
Zhou, Minqiang; Langerock, Bavo; Vigouroux, Corinne; Sha, Mahesh Kumar; Hermans, Christian; Metzger, Jean-Marc; Chen, Huilin; Ramonet, Michel; Kivi, Rigel; Heikkinen, Pauli; Smale, Dan; Pollard, David F.; Jones, Nicholas; Velazco, Voltaire A.; García, Omaira E.; Schneider, Matthias; Palm, Mathias; Warneke, Thorsten; De Mazière, Martine
- Abstract
Column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO (X CO) measurements are obtained from two ground-based Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer networks: the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC). In this study, the differences between the TCCON and NDACC X CO measurements are investigated and discussed based on six NDACC–TCCON sites using data over the period 2007–2017. A direct comparison shows that the NDACC X CO measurements are about 5.5 % larger than the TCCON data at Ny-Ålesund, Bremen, and Izaña (Northern Hemisphere), and the absolute bias between the NDACC and TCCON data is within 2 % at Saint-Denis, Wollongong and Lauder (Southern Hemisphere). The hemispheric dependence of the bias is mainly attributed to their smoothing errors. The systematic smoothing error of the TCCON X CO data varies in the range between 0.2 % (Bremen) and 7.9 % (Lauder), and the random smoothing error varies in the range between 2.0 % and 3.6 %. The systematic smoothing error of NDACC data is between 0.1 % and 0.8 %, and the random smoothing error of NDACC data is about 0.3 %. For TCCON data, the smoothing error is significant because it is higher than the reported uncertainty, particularly at Southern Hemisphere sites. To reduce the influence from the a priori profiles and different vertical sensitivities, the scaled NDACC a priori profiles are used as the common a priori profiles for comparing TCCON and NDACC retrievals. As a result, the biases between TCCON and NDACC X CO measurements become more consistent (5.6 %–8.5 %) with a mean value of 6.8 % at these sites. To determine the sources of the remaining bias, regular AirCore measurements at Orléans and Sodankylä are compared to co-located TCCON measurements. It is found that TCCON X CO measurements are 6.1 ± 1.6 % and 8.0 ± 3.2 % smaller than the AirCore measurements at Orléans and Sodankylä, respectively, indicating that the scaling factor of TCCON X CO data should be around 1.0000 instead of 1.0672. Further investigations should be carried out in the TCCON community to determine the correct scaling factor to be applied to the TCCON X CO data. This paper also demonstrates that the smoothing error must be taken into account when comparing FTIR X CO data, and especially TCCON X CO data, with model or satellite data.
- Subjects
ORLEANS (France); BREMEN (Germany); ATMOSPHERIC composition; MOLE fraction; FOURIER transforms
- Publication
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2019, Vol 12, Issue 11, p5979
- ISSN
1867-1381
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5194/amt-12-5979-2019